Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/6558
Comparison of ground-based FTIR and Brewer O3 total column with data from two different IASI algorithms and from OMI and GOME-2 satellite instruments [Discussion paper]
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorViatte, Camillees_ES
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Matthiases_ES
dc.contributor.authorRedondas, Albertoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorHase, Frankes_ES
dc.contributor.authorEremenko, M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorChelin, P.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFlaud, J.-M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBlumenstock, Thomases_ES
dc.contributor.authorOrphal, Johanneses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-13T06:26:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-13T06:26:57Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2010, 3, p. 5833–5865es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1867-8610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/6558-
dc.description.abstractAn intercomparison of ozone total column measurements derived from various platforms is presented in this work. Satellite data from Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME-2) are compared with data from two ground-based spectrometers (Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometer FTIR and Brewer), located at the Network for Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) super-site of Izaña (Tenerife), measured during a campaign from March to June 2009. These ground-based observing systems have already been demonstrated to perform consistent, precise and accurate ozone total column measurements. An excellent agreement between ground-based and OMI/GOME-2 data is observed. Results from two different algorithms for deriving IASI ozone total column are also compared: the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT/ESA) operational algorithm and the LISA (Laboratoire Inter-universitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques) algorithm. A better agreement was found with LISA's analytical approach based on an altitude-dependent Tikhonov-Philips regularization: correlations are 0.94 and 0.89 compared to FTIR and Brewer, respectively; while the operational IASI ozone columns (based on neural network analysis) show correlations of 0.90 and 0.85, respectively, compared to the O3 columns obtained from FTIR and Brewer.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Uniones_ES
dc.rightsLicencia CC: Reconocimiento CC BYes_ES
dc.subjectOzone total columnes_ES
dc.subjectSpectrometerses_ES
dc.subjectOzone concentrationses_ES
dc.subjectBrewer observationses_ES
dc.subjectFTIR observationses_ES
dc.titleComparison of ground-based FTIR and Brewer O3 total column with data from two different IASI algorithms and from OMI and GOME-2 satellite instruments [Discussion paper]es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-3-5833-2010es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
Appears in Collections:Artículos científicos 2010-2014


Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat 
amtd-3-5833-2010.pdf
3,28 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



Items in Arcimís are protected by Creative Commons License, unless otherwise indicated.

Arcimís Repository
Nota Legal Contacto y sugerencias