Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/7366
Validation of OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsula
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAntón, Manueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorLópez, M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorVilaplana, José Manueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorKroon, M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMcPeters, Richardes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBañón García, Manueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, A.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-01T07:44:14Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-01T07:44:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2009, 114(D14), p. 1-10es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2169-897X-
dc.identifier.issn2169-8996-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/7366-
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the comparison of the total ozone column data from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) flying aboard the NASA EOS-Aura satellite platform with ground-based measurement recorded by Brewer spectroradiometers located at five Spanish remote sensing ground stations between January 2005 and December 2007. The satellite data are derived from two algorithms: OMI Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (OMI-TOMS) and OMI Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (OMI-DOAS). The largest relative differences between these OMI total ozone column estimates reach 5% with a significant seasonal dependence. The agreement between OMI ozone data and Brewer measurements is excellent. Total ozone columns from OMI-TOMS are on average a mere 2.0% lower than Brewer data. For OMI-DOAS data the bias is a mere 1.4%. However, the relative difference between OMI-TOMS and Brewer measurements shows a notably lower seasonal dependence and variability than the differences between OMI-DOAS and ground-based data. For both OMI ozone data products these relative differences show significant dependence on the satellite ground pixel solar zenith angle for cloud-free cases as well as for cloudy conditions. However, the OMI ozone data products are shown to reveal opposite behavior with respect to the two antagonistic sky conditions. No significant dependency of the ground-based to satellite-based differences with respect to the satellite cross-track position is seen for either OMI retrieval algorithm.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was partially supported by Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia under Project CGL2005-05693-C03-03/CLI and by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación under project CGL2008-05939-C03-02/CLI.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Uniones_ES
dc.subjectTotal ozone columnes_ES
dc.subjectAuraes_ES
dc.subjectBreweres_ES
dc.subjectSatellitees_ES
dc.subjectValidationes_ES
dc.titleValidation of OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsulaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhtpps://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012003es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
Appears in Collections:Artículos científicos 2005-2009


Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat 
Lopez Bartolome et al...
1,07 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



Items in Arcimís are protected by Creative Commons License, unless otherwise indicated.

Arcimís Repository
Nota Legal Contacto y sugerencias