Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/10157
Aerosol Optical Depth comparison between GAW-PFR and AERONET-Cimel radiometers from long term (2005–2015) 1-minute synchronous measurements [Discussion paper]
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCuevas Agulló, Emilioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRomero Campos, Pedro Migueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorKouremeti, Nataliaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorKazadzis, Stelioses_ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Cabrera, Rosa Deliaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBarreto Velasco, Áfricaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGuirado-Fuentes, Carmenes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRamos López, Ramónes_ES
dc.contributor.authorToledano, Carloses_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlmansa Rodríguez, Antonio Fernandoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGröbner, Julianes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-19T08:54:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-19T08:54:30Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2018es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1867-8610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/10157-
dc.description.abstractA comprehensive comparison of more than 70000 synchronous 1-minute aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from three Global Atmosphere Watch-Precision Filter Radiometer (GAW-PFR) and 15 Aerosol Robotic Network-Cimel (AERONET-Cimel) radiometers was performed for the four nearby wavelengths (380, 440, 500 and 870nm) in the period 2005–2015. The goal of this study is to assess whether, despite the marked differences between both networks and the number of instruments used, their long term AOD data are comparable and consistent. AOD traceability established by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) consists in determining the percentage of synchronous data within specific limits. If, at least, 95% of the AOD differences of an instrument compared to the WMO standards lie within these limits, both data populations are considered equivalent. The percentage of traceable data is 92.7% (380nm), 95.7% (440nm), 95.8% (500nm) and 98.0% (870nm). When small misalignments in GAW-PFR sun-pointing were fixed (period 2010–2015), the percentage of traceable data increased. The contribution of calibration related aspects to comparison outside the 95% traceability limits is insignificant in all channels, except in 380nm. The simultaneous failure of both cloud screening algorithms might occur only under the presence of cirrus, or altostratus clouds on the top of a dust-laden Saharan air layer. Differences in the calculation of the optical depth contribution due to Rayleigh scattering, and O3 and NO2 absorption have a negligible impact. For AOD >0.1, a non-negligible percentage (≈1.9%) of the AOD data outside the 95% traceability limits at 380nm can be partly assigned to the different field of view of the instruments. The comparison of the Angström exponent (AE) shows that under non-pristine conditions (AOD >0.03 and AE <1) the AE differences remain <0.1. The excellent traceability in this study has been obtained using well calibrated Master instruments.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by the project “The Global Atmosphere Watch Precision Filter Radiometer (GAW-PFR) Network for Aerosol Optical Depth long term measurements” supported by Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz – GCOS Swiss Office. Part of the AERONET-Cimel radiometers have been calibrated at Izaña Observatory by AERONETEUROPE Calibration Service, financed by the European Community specific programs for Integrating Activities: Research Infrastructure Action under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), ACTRIS grant agreement No. 262254, and Horizon 2020 Research 25 and Innovation Program, ACTRIS-2 grant agreement No. 654109. This research has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 654109 (ACTRIS-2).The funding by MINECO (CTM2015-66742-R) and Junta de Castilla y León (VA100P17) is also gratefully acknowledgedes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Uniones_ES
dc.rightsLicencia CC: Reconocimiento CC BYes_ES
dc.subjectAerosol optical depthes_ES
dc.subjectRadiometerses_ES
dc.subjectGlobal Atmosphere Watches_ES
dc.subjectAERONET-Cimeles_ES
dc.subjectAerosol measurementes_ES
dc.titleAerosol Optical Depth comparison between GAW-PFR and AERONET-Cimel radiometers from long term (2005–2015) 1-minute synchronous measurements [Discussion paper]es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-438es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/262254-
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/654109-
Colecciones: Artículos científicos 2015-2018


Ficheros en este ítem:
  Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
amt-2018-438.pdf
2,79 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem



Los ítems de Arcimis están protegidos por una Licencia Creative Commons, salvo que se indique lo contrario.

Repositorio Arcimis
Nota Legal Contacto y sugerencias