Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/12318
Sensitivity analysis of the WRF model: Assessment of performance in high resolution simulations in complex terrain in the Canary Islands
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuárez Molina, Davides_ES
dc.contributor.authorFernández-González, Sergioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMontero García, Gustavoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Albertes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSuárez González, Juan Carloses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T11:04:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-31T11:04:57Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Research. 2021, 247, 105157es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0169-8095-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11765/12318-
dc.description.abstractCanary Islands and other regions have been greatly damaged by weather events during the last decades. For this reason, the main duty of National Meteorological Services is to minimize socio-economic losses by forecasting adverse weather episodes with enough time in advance. To achieve this goal, the use of numerical weather prediction models is highly relevant. And, even more crucial, is to comprehend the model accuracy. In this paper, an exhaustive sensitivity analysis of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over the Canary Islands has been carried out. The complex terrain of the archipelago makes the islands a test bench of high interest. Four scores were used to assess the accuracy of the model configurations: Bias, mean absolute error (MAE), root of the Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and the correlation coefficient (r). Initially, twenty-five WRF model configurations were considered. However, a preliminary test discarded inadequate configurations, and reduced the number to six. The variables of interest were air temperature at 2 m (T2m), maximum 1-h wind gust at 10 m and 3-h rainfall accumulation. The results indicated a systematic wind speed underestimation. This underestimation is related to the influence of the location and the complex orography. The most accurate wind forecasts were obtained using the Mellor-Yamada-Janjic Planetary Boudary Layer (PBL) scheme with the WSM6 microphysics (MP) scheme. Another major conclusion is that, for precipitation, the PBL scheme has a greater impact than the MP scheme. Finally, the results show that the Boulac – Thompson combination is the most accurate regarding T2m forecast.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipObservational data are provided by the State Meteorological Agency of Spain (AEMET). The authors are grateful to the Weather Forecast Research Team for developing “Verif” software. Special thanks go to the SAFEFLIGHT (CGL2016-78702-C2-1-R and CGL2016-78702-C2-2-R) and UE ERA-NET Plus NEWA (PCIN2016-080) projects.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.subjectWRFes_ES
dc.subjectSensitivity analysises_ES
dc.subjectComplex terraines_ES
dc.subjectMicrophysicses_ES
dc.subjectPlanetary boundary layeres_ES
dc.subjectNumerical weather predictiones_ES
dc.subjectHigh resolution simulationses_ES
dc.titleSensitivity analysis of the WRF model: Assessment of performance in high resolution simulations in complex terrain in the Canary Islandses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105157es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
Appears in Collections:Artículos científicos 2019-2022


Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat 
Atmos_105157_WRF.pdf
3,52 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



Items in Arcimis are protected by Creative Commons License, unless otherwise indicated.

Arcimis Repository
Nota Legal Contacto y sugerencias